Expanding the Conversation on Environmentalism and Working for Environmental Justice

Manage SCOPE of Forest Fires

In Colorado there are 3.6M+ acres of beetle-kill pine. We are in a sever to extreme drought and it is only getting worse every day.

Current USDA Forest Service policy and budget allow for the protection of human life and residential structures. Forest firest are not prevented from occurring (using thinning of deadwood and other management practices), as learned from the Yellowstone fire.

This beetle-kill is primarily in large contiguous bands, as can be seen in maps provided through Colorado State University. These bands may have over a thousand square miles of explosively flammable beetle kill pine all together.

seems like a perfect storm.

1. Identify critical habitat of endangered species and give their protection, priority. Thin out deadwood in their critical area, as the Yellowstone lesson does not apply to habitat of endangered plant and animal species.

Surround their critical habitat with fire control lines.

2. Break up the contiguous zones into manageable blocks with fire control lines. In this way, fires can be allowed to start naturally, but then their SCOPE is managed. Instead of having hundreds of square miles of precious resource squandered in one superfire, the fire will burn until it reaches the preemptive fire control lines, and run out of fuel.

This all needs to be done quickly, as this summer is looking like the season of superfires.

Note that this issue is even more pronounced in Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, where their beetle-kill problem is 10x that of Colorado.

Besides loss of habitat and squandering of a precious resource, there are numerous other ramifications. Consider the impact to tourism, for example. Consider water and air quality from such an event. Consider the potential loss of life, and loss of quality of life for the citizens of the affected states.


Submitted by

Stage: Active

Feedback Score

6 votes

Idea Details

Vote Activity

  1. Upvoted
  2. Upvoted
  3. Upvoted
  4. Upvoted
  5. Upvoted
  6. Upvoted

Similar Ideas [ 4 ]


  1. Status Changed from Pending Approval to Active
  2. The idea was posted


  1. Comment

    Though some fires are considered beneficial, many are not. Under extreme conditions, the public needs to be restricted from those lands. And special techniques should be set into motion, as to dealing with to much dry material building up, creating a huge potential for an out of control fire. Maybe simply reducing the volume around and near populated areas and other such areas deemed to valuable or dangerous to allow to be burned We must weight all the factors and exclude the opinions of those that profit from the issue, because their opinions might naturally be tainted by the factors of greed or self-preservation. Many fires have been started by firefighters who were either out of work, or looking to gain leverage in their efforts to win government contracts.

Add your comment

Your comment will be published after it's approved by the moderators.